Already a member?
Sign in
Zen and West
Hi everyone,
our friend Stuart Lachs has produced a series of articles, the most recent of which is entitled "Zen Master in America: Dressing the donkey with bells and scarves". This one follows in the line of inquiry from previous papers and articles by Lachs, all of which can be found below in .pdf format for download. The focus is not on practice, or the doctrinal basis, but on institution and its pervasive influence on both practice and view. I recommend these articles as fine examples of spiritual authenticity, forged in longterm practice, combined with intellectual honesty through critical inquiry. But first, an intro to the articles by the author himself -
Links to articles in .pdf format:
Coming Down from the Zen Clouds (1994)
Means of Authorization (1999)
The Myth of the Zen Roshi (2002)
Zen Master in America (2006)
Plus, Josh Baran's 1998 review of Brian Victoria's "Zen at War" (1997) in .html (link here).
Join the discussion below or - even better - start a new thread, because the issues looked at in these essays are not limited to Zen. Every spiritual tradition has its own way of casting a shadow, and institutions are not going away any time soon.
our friend Stuart Lachs has produced a series of articles, the most recent of which is entitled "Zen Master in America: Dressing the donkey with bells and scarves". This one follows in the line of inquiry from previous papers and articles by Lachs, all of which can be found below in .pdf format for download. The focus is not on practice, or the doctrinal basis, but on institution and its pervasive influence on both practice and view. I recommend these articles as fine examples of spiritual authenticity, forged in longterm practice, combined with intellectual honesty through critical inquiry. But first, an intro to the articles by the author himself -
"I have been a Zen practitioner for roughly forty years. Many years ago I became interested in viewing Zen from a scholarly point of view as a way to explain the great disparity I witnessed between how the Zen institution claimed its leaders behaved and what I saw first hand. I was driven to understand what was happening and why, not out of a dry, academic interest, but rather, by the confusion, trouble and suffering that I and others were experiencing.
By luck, in the early 1990's, I met an academically-minded monk connected with Chinese Buddhism. From him, I was introduced to an academic view of the history of Zen that strongly contrasted with the more familiar history promulgated by the Zen institution. Needless to say, it was an eye opener that led to many exciting hours of study up to this day. Later, through a friend, I became interested in the sociology of religion and of institutions.
Looking at Zen through both the lens of academic history and the lens of the sociology of religion and institutions, I hope to show how Zen developed over time, and how it responded to historical settings and necessities. I will show how the institution that has grown up around Zen functions - as do most institutions - to promote and protect itself, and how it empowers its leaders and enables that power to function.
I am attempting to make clear for myself and other Zen practitioners what is happening at Zen centers in America. I have found some conceptual tools that helped me analyze how these Zen centers operate. These tools were especially helpful in understanding how the conceptions of Dharma transmission and unbroken lineage and their supporting structures impact Zen students' lives at their Centers.
Critical thinking is Buddhist and Buddhism is critical thinking. By demanding tough answers and not being satisfied with easy ones, I hope to improve the situation of Zen in America which, since the mid- 1960's , has suffered from repeated scandals - scandals that hurt its practitioners, caused others to leave and marred its reputation for years to come.
Buddhism has a history of adaptability to many cultures. No doubt, it will adapt to the West. We have an opportunity, by understanding the institutions and history of Zen, to claim its true spirit and inherent freedom for our lives."
Links to articles in .pdf format:
Coming Down from the Zen Clouds (1994)
Means of Authorization (1999)
The Myth of the Zen Roshi (2002)
Zen Master in America (2006)
Plus, Josh Baran's 1998 review of Brian Victoria's "Zen at War" (1997) in .html (link here).
Join the discussion below or - even better - start a new thread, because the issues looked at in these essays are not limited to Zen. Every spiritual tradition has its own way of casting a shadow, and institutions are not going away any time soon.
|
Hokai |
Latest page update: made by Hokai
, Apr 16 2008, 6:58 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
49 words added 1 word deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
hierarchy
institution
transmission
zen
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| monkeymind | For us non-Zennies, non-group-practitioners without a teacher | 1 | Aug 9 2008, 6:47 AM EDT by monkeymind | |
|
Thread started: Aug 9 2008, 6:39 AM EDT
Watch
After meeting Adrian and discussing the previous "And so?" thread, I think I might just be about to see what you are all staring at so fixedly. Wow!
I didn't participate in the previous thread because I simply didn't see any particular problem: "Powerful people exploiting gullible believers? People disappointed because their holy scriptures were not in fact written down verbatim by the founder of their religion? Astonishment that one's unrealistic models / wishful thinking about enlightened role models crumbles under the pressure of observable facts? Either I don't get it, or you people are awfully naive!" (pleas note the quotes - that's what I was thinking all these months while following the previous thread). Anyway, after telling Adrian my opinion on the matter, during the subsequent discussion I realized: 1) I'm not a Zennie - so I naturally abstracted the situation to the well-known points about power, gullibility and delusion, and missed how it's about real people actually suffering under the situation, 2) I'm a solitary practitioner, do not have a particular teacher or congregation of real flesh-and-blood people to belong to, so again I just stripped away all the stuff I was unfamiliar with and was left with some obvious general truths about people, 3) The tradition I most closely studies was Theravada, and that there might just be some truth to the image of the "selfish" nature perceived in its principles from a Mahayana point of view - I reacted along the lines of "who cares if the stories are made up, if the institutions are corrupt, if the models are wildly off the mark - all that counts in a teaching is whether it works, and all that I want of a teacher is that they know what they are talking about concerning the teaching, and I don't trust titles and positions anyway". (cont.)
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
hierarchy
institution
transmission
zen
|
||||
| albill | And so? (page: 1 2 3 4) | 64 | Jul 10 2008, 7:52 AM EDT by SANTTHOSH | |
|
Thread started: Feb 18 2008, 7:03 PM EST
Watch
I've looked through these articles, briefly, and I can see the themes. I cannot say that I am terribly surprised by them.
I'm not sure what you would like people to take away from reading them though I do find them to be potentially valuable. Buddhism in the West is in an interesting place and likely to be there for quite some time.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
hierarchy
institution
transmission
zen
|
||||
